[1]I found this [2] very interesting text by Bertrand Russell through this post [3] in John Wilkins' "Evolving Thoughts" blog, over at ScienceBlogs.com [4] here's the link to it again: http://www.solstice.us/russell/agnostic.html [5] I don't see any point in reposting it like Wilkins did - the piece is set very convenient in the source page, so go read it there. And I'm not very keen to comment it either, although it's a long text, and as such has many "handles" to base an argument on. (that is - i do not totally agree with everything in it :) ) But like in the case with the Humanism definition, it's put good enough and it is interesting enough, and the extent to which I agree with it is also enough to throw it on the haystack of arguments and save me some time and effort of wording it myself. Continue Reading » [6] [1] http://ffox.fccf.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/06/russell1.JPG [2] http://www.solstice.us/russell/agnostic.html [3] http://scienceblogs.com/evolvingthoughts/2007/06/what_is_an_agnostic_by_bertran.php [4] http://scienceblogs.com/evolvingthoughts/2007/06/what_is_an_agnostic_by_bertran.php [5] http://www.solstice.us/russell/agnostic.html [6] http://ffox.fccf.net/blog/index.php/2007/06/10/agnosticism-defined/#more-169

[gv data="JVRsWAjvQSg"][/gv] Very long. Very nice. This is one of the posts that clogged my Drafts list this year for quite a while, and i decided to post it just now, so i can get on with it before the year is over. Maybe i should do the same with the others, or at least - post them together in one post. We'll see.

перфектен комикстрип в литъл геймърс! общо взето, не оставя място за коментар, ама аз все пак да добавя един полуцитат, който ме грабна наскоро - "Не че имам нещо против равноправието на религиите, ама... абе, все пак няма будистки терористи, нали?"